Don't worry, this is not a blog post in which I will say, "But! But! We're not all like this! Because SISTERHOOD, and love, and friendship, and fostering relationships in the Greek community." I really don't think I have to defend sororities. We're doing just fine without your approval, you angry, jealous losers. (Ha ha, just kidding...maybe!) I'm writing this blog post because it seems to me that the conversation has derailed, and we need to get it back on track. Until this point, it's been all about, "This girl is awful!" and "Will DG shut down this chapter?" (Update: this afternoon, DG announced that it has accepted her resignation! More on that in a minute.)
Like many of you, I have seen this girl's Twitter account, in addition to the e-mail. And whooooa there, it is not pretty! She sounds like mean girl at best, and a real racist! If I ever had the misfortune of meeting her, I imagine she would probably tweet something along the lines of, "ugh what's the point of being tall if you're too ugly to be a model #fatpeoplesuck. #yolo" I don't know the girl, and I'm certainly not going to defend the horrible things she has said. However, I will say that we all need to drop the attacks on her immediately or prepare to live with the consequences, the most notable of which will be the resulting Lifetime movie. This movie will probably be amazing(ly horrible) but also maddening, because it will basically be an un-funny version of "The House Bunny" with lessons for suburban moms about what happens when you let your daughter wear a denim mini-skirt. (Spoiler alert: they turn to binge drinking, sexting, and finally, a hell-spiral of Internet notoriety!)
Now that we have movies on the brain, I'mma get real for a second and talk about a movie that actually reminds me of this e-mail situation. It's called "A Few Good Men." Ever heard of it? Well in case you are too AWKWARD and WEIRD to have heard of this film, it's on TNT pretty much every Sunday afternoon, peasants. In fact, it was on just the other day, which is probably why I am thinking of it now. And yes, I think it is extremely relevant to the Deranged Sorority Girl e-mail debacle. Here's a little refresher on the plot, from good ol' Wikipedz:
Lieutenant Junior Grade Daniel "Danny" Kaffee (Tom Cruise) is an inexperienced U.S. Navy Judge Advocate General's Corps lawyer who leads the defense in the court-martial of two U.S. Marines, Private First Class Louden Downey (James Marshall) and Lance Corporal Harold Dawson (Wolfgang Bodison), who are accused of having murdered a fellow Marine of their unit, PFC William Santiago (Michael DeLorenzo), at the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base in Cuba, which is under the command of Colonel Nathan R. Jessup (Jack Nicholson).
Santiago compared unfavorably to his fellow Marines, had poor relations with them, and failed to respect the chain of command. He went above his superiors to bargain for a transfer in exchange for blowing the whistle on Dawson for firing a possibly illegal shot towards the Cuban side of the island...Lieutenant Colonel Matthew Andrew Markinson (J.T. Walsh) advocates that Santiago be transferred immediately for safety reasons before the request gets out, but Jessup says that this would set a bad precedent which could cost lives...Jessup orders Kendrick to ensure that Santiago shows significant improvement on the next evaluation report...Naval investigator and lawyer Lieutenant Commander JoAnne Galloway (Demi Moore) suspects [accused murderers Downey and Dawson] were carrying out a "code red": a euphemism for a violent extrajudicial punishment.
In the course of the trial, it is established that "code reds" are standard in Guantanamo Bay as a means of enforcing discipline and getting sloppy Marines to follow procedure.
Kaffee...manages to unnerve Jessup by pointing out a flaw in his testimony. He had stated that Santiago was due to be transferred off the base for his own safety in case the other Marines sought retribution, but also stated that Marines are honorable men who always follow orders – thus if the other Marines were ordered to leave Santiago alone and always follow orders, then Santiago would have been in no danger whatsoever and would not have to be transferred. Under heavy pressure from Kaffee and unnerved by being caught in one of his own lies, Jessup furiously declares, "You can't handle the truth!" He then dismisses Kaffee...ultimately confessing that he did order the "code red." As Jessup angrily justifies his actions on the basis of national security, he is arrested by Ross. Ross informs Kaffee that he will now have Kendrick arrested for Santiago's murder.
...Dawson and Downey are found not guilty regarding Santiago's murder; nonetheless, they are dishonorably discharged for having caused Santiago's death through their "conduct unbecoming a United States Marine." Downey does not understand why they are being given dishonorable discharges, but Dawson accepts the verdict, and explains to Downey that they had failed to stand up for those too weak to stand up for themselves, like Santiago.
There are a few key lessons here.
1. Everyone knows that Jessup is the real villain in the story. It's not the two dudes who murdered Santiago with the rag, and it's not even Kendrick. Downey and Dawson physically murdered Santiago. But that's because Kendrick told them to do it, and that was because Jessup told him to do it. Jessup is the bad guy. And Becks, our electronic letter-writing friend, is no Jessup. She is a Lt. Kendrick, at most. I have seen some blogs incorrectly stating that E-mail Girl is (was) the president of her chapter. Not so. She held a leadership position (most likely one that made her responsible for Greek Week) but she was not calling all the shots. So why did she order the Greek Week code red? It's unlikely that she is the only person in her chapter who cares about Greek Week. If she were part of a chapter that ignores Greek Week, she would have been sharing a pitcher with the Sigma Nus and Instagraming photos of her nail-art, not rage-typing her feelings. Somebody expected this girl to get Greek Week in order. I'm not saying she got a direct order to send that e-mail, but girl needed she had get her chapter full of Santiagos in line. Problem is, at least one girl at Guantanamo couldn't keep her mouth shut, and now people are all, "Goodness gracious! Shut down Guantanamo!"
2. People, aren't we forgetting something? This girl wrote a crazy e-mail to her sorority sisters. She did not, however, write a crazy e-mail to Gawker. Somebody leaked that e-mail. And then, somebody else published it. Gawker's little tag line is, "Today's gossip tomorrow's news." So does Gawker consider itself a place where "journalism" occurs? The sorority e-mail breaks a big ol' bucket of these things. Here's an excerpt from a run-of-the-mill Statement of Ethics:
We should be especially sensitive to the legitimate privacy concerns of ordinary citizens who are thrust into the news: innocent bystanders, witnesses, victims, relatives, heroes, whistleblowers and minors. We're in the information business, and that means we want details and background and facts. But the value and relevance of publishing such information as names, religious beliefs, sexual orientation, ethnicity and past behavior should be weighed against compassion for the individual.
If my family were planning some sort of reunion event and I got stressed out and sent an angry e-mail, in a billion years I would not expect a cousin or uncle or grandparent to forward said e-mail to Gawker and ruin my life. It would be extremely uncool of that family member, and extremely inappropriate and unnecessary on Gawker's end. I don't really think this is any different. Wouldn't the world have been better off without this unfortunate incident? Aside from a funny video, what have we really gained? Certainly less than that girl has lost.
3.
Son, we live in a world that has walls, and those walls have to be guarded by men with guns. Who's gonna do it? You? You, Lt. Weinburg? I have a greater responsibility than you could possibly fathom. You weep for Santiago, and you curse the Marines. You have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing what I know. That Santiago's death, while tragic, probably saved lives. And my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, saves lives. You don't want the truth because deep down in places you don't talk about at parties, you want me on that wall, you need me on that wall. We use words like honor, code, loyalty. We use these words as the backbone of a life spent defending something. You use them as a punchline. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very freedom that I provide, and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather you just said thank you, and went on your way, Otherwise, I suggest you pick up a weapon, and stand a post. Either way, I don't give a damn what you think you are entitled to.
To clarify, I am not likening Greek Life to being in the military. Not in any way, shape, or form. Juuuust so we're clear.
This afternoon, the sorority's national office posted this on Facebook:
As mean and frightening as this girl probably is, I sort of feel for her.
During junior year, I - along with a sister-friend - got in a tiny bit of trouble with Sorority Law. I was having a rough semester. Major family issues. The sorority activities distracted me from it all. My sister-in-crime and I decided to celebrate a recent accomplishment by having a cocktail (seriously, one drink) before an event - an event that we planned! An event that we were in charge of.
In. charge. of.
Well, somebody called the Fun Police, and we got called into the sorority version of The Hague. Apparently, someone got mad (nay, jealous!) that we had made a pre-event toast. She put on her snitch pants and tried to take us down. I remember being called in for a meeting with a couple members of the executive board and one of our adult chapter advisors. I was told that they considered banning us from the semi-formal, everything was unacceptable, blah blah blah. But the worst part was when they said, "We have noticed that you haven't been yourself lately. Is everything okay? We're worried about you."
This is what I consider an area for improvement in the Greek community.
There are some groups that do the whole no-snitch, protect-our-own thing really well. Usually it's bad, because it's when someone gets raped or shot and no one talks, and I am not in favor of that sort of silence or loyalty. And obviously, if E-mail Nazi had been hazing girls or actually kicking them in the genitals, that should get reported. But - as far we know - she did not do either of those things. She sent an e-mail. Now, she's being ridiculed all across the Internet. Her picture is on all sorts of blogs with very harsh captions and comments. If there were ever a time a girl could use 100 close friends, it would be now. But she just got kicked out of her sorority, because they were embarrassed.
Would anyone have cared if DG had issued a statement that said, "We regret that an e-mail was published, and that the e-mail contained some iffy language and some questionable judgment. Obviously, our sisters over at the University of Maryland have been staying up a little late working on their Greek Week dance! Take care, everybody!" Not really! The whole thing would have blown over in a couple of days. But they had to save face. Every other sorority's national office probably would have done the exact same thing. It's puzzling to me, with all the sorority girls that go into PR, that no one has realized the pointlessness in this reaction. Announcing that the member has resigned doesn't erase the e-mail. It just shows that nobody is guarding the wall.
If E-mail Girl is really a Twitter-loving racist, the chapter shouldn't have let her in - or given her a position on the board. But they did, so they should be standing by her.
Anyway, this is still funny:
There are some groups that do the whole no-snitch, protect-our-own thing really well. Usually it's bad, because it's when someone gets raped or shot and no one talks, and I am not in favor of that sort of silence or loyalty. And obviously, if E-mail Nazi had been hazing girls or actually kicking them in the genitals, that should get reported. But - as far we know - she did not do either of those things. She sent an e-mail. Now, she's being ridiculed all across the Internet. Her picture is on all sorts of blogs with very harsh captions and comments. If there were ever a time a girl could use 100 close friends, it would be now. But she just got kicked out of her sorority, because they were embarrassed.
Would anyone have cared if DG had issued a statement that said, "We regret that an e-mail was published, and that the e-mail contained some iffy language and some questionable judgment. Obviously, our sisters over at the University of Maryland have been staying up a little late working on their Greek Week dance! Take care, everybody!" Not really! The whole thing would have blown over in a couple of days. But they had to save face. Every other sorority's national office probably would have done the exact same thing. It's puzzling to me, with all the sorority girls that go into PR, that no one has realized the pointlessness in this reaction. Announcing that the member has resigned doesn't erase the e-mail. It just shows that nobody is guarding the wall.
If E-mail Girl is really a Twitter-loving racist, the chapter shouldn't have let her in - or given her a position on the board. But they did, so they should be standing by her.
Anyway, this is still funny:


...